May 23, 2012
Books I got today:

Lady Susan/The Watsons/Sanditon by Jane Austen

The Awakening by Kate Chopin

Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte

The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath

Beloved by Toni Morrison

Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston

I also got an advance copy of The Pleasures of Men by Kate Williams in the mail the other day.

So much reading to do. So little time.

However, I’ve played to the end of the Torchlight 2 beta and it ends at 4pm tomorrow, so I’ll have all weekend to read and write.

AND it’s a three day weekend, so I should have some time on Monday as well since I’m trying to keep my working at home to a minimum this weekend because I’m exhausted.

7:56pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZOglYyM0zV0W
(View comments  
Filed under: books reading 
May 16, 2012
The Hero’s Guide to Saving Your Kingdom
Currently reading. I can’t wait to read this one with my daughter. I generally focus on reading girl-centered books with her, but this book is really cute and clever. Even though it’s not girl-centric it still has several wonderful and unique girl characters, and it’s a funny take on what happens after fairy tales.

The Hero’s Guide to Saving Your Kingdom

Currently reading. I can’t wait to read this one with my daughter. I generally focus on reading girl-centered books with her, but this book is really cute and clever. Even though it’s not girl-centric it still has several wonderful and unique girl characters, and it’s a funny take on what happens after fairy tales.

May 12, 2012
New Project: A Year of Reading Feminist-ly

I’ve been thinking about this for a while, but I’m finally working to get this project started. Basically, I’m planning on spending the next year:

  1. Reading books by women: I’m relatively well-read, but I recognize that I haven’t read many books by women. I’d like to read more, but I think the only way for me to do it is to do it on purpose by not reading books by men.
  2. Reading books by WOC, non-American/non-English women, queer women, and trans women: Again, I think this is something that I need to do on purpose.
  3. Writing reviews of books that I’ve read or am reading.
  4. Writing about women in media, specifically in movies and television shows that I watch, including but not limited to: Game of Thrones, Doctor Who, Mad Men, and several older TV shows (possible Buffy, BSG, Torchwood, Angel, and others). I haven’t completely decided where I’m going to go with this yet, but I have lots of feelings about things, and I’d like to share them.
  5. Writing about media literacy in generally, especially as it regards advertising.
  6. Possibly some other TBA stuff, but primarily focusing on books.

What I need: SUGGESTIONS. Books to read, mostly. I can’t guarantee I’ll read everything, but I’d like to have some outside ideas in addition to what I already have planned.

May 2, 2012

Sometimes I love reading interviews with authors, especially people whose books I haven’t read. I think this is because if I haven’t read their books I can’t be too disappointed by them since I don’t feel like I know them at all yet. I can simply be charmed when they say something clever or interesting about writing or reading or the publishing business.

I just read an interview with Gillian Flynn (Dark Places; Sharp Pieces; Gone Girl), and she had this to say when asked if she felt that there were different expectations for her as a writer of of “dark, edgy fiction” than there are for men:

I like to think that’s becoming less and less of an issue, now that so many authors of great, dark stories happen to be women. I can’t change my gender—female— and I can’t change the way I look, which is decidedly unthreatening (Comment I most often hear at any book event: “But you look so sweeeet!”). However, I can promise you, if you pick up one of my books, I will disturb you in a most unladylike way.

I love that last line. I’m not sure if I should read her books now or if I should stay away from them forever so as not to ruin this feeling.

April 29, 2012
Currently Reading: Rebel Angels by Libba Bray

I loved A Great and Terrible Beauty, but I’m starting to think that these books were rather poorly researched. They’re supposed to be taking place in 1895, but there have been a handful of pretty glaring anachronisms. It’s bothering me, because I’m really loving the series so far, but this sort of stuff makes it hard for me to really immerse myself in the world of the books.

Like, everything will be fine, but then it’s “Hello! All-male acting troupe! Don’t you belong in about 1595?”

Sigh. It just seems a little lazy, and it’s disappointing because there is so much else that is really good about these stories.

April 11, 2012
"The Hunger Games movie may not have had trouble earning a PG-13 rating, but many parents and educators are wondering whether the best-selling book trilogy belongs on library shelves. The American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom released its annual list of most frequently challenged books of 2011 yesterday, and the increased popularity of Suzanne Collins’ dystopian saga — in large part fueled by buzz surrounding the blockbuster film — drove the books higher on the list. In 2010, only the first novel cracked the top ten at number five. In 2011, all three books occupy the number three position, and the complaints have grown more varied: “anti-ethnic; anti-family; insensitivity; offensive language; occult/satanic; violence."

‘The Hunger Games’ ignites the ALA’s list of most challenged books | Shelf Life | EW.com

February 21, 2012
Just re-read Shopgirl, by Steve Martin.

I’m trying to process what it is about the book that I find really unsettling now that didn’t bother me when I read the book for the first time years ago.

It’s like it’s not quite misogynistic, but yeah, it kind of is.

Mirabelle’s coming of age is measured by her success at finding a man who loves her properly, but while I agree that being able to form healthy relationships is part of growing up, it’s not as if it’s any particular failure on her part that impedes her relationships through most of the book. Jeremy and Ray are both kind of assholes, and as soon as they get their shit together, Mirabelle is able to continue her own path to adulthood.

Jeremy goes away and becomes a decent person, and Ray learns how to love and support Mirabelle in a way that is good for her—instead of taking her for granted and using her to figure himself out.

The other named woman in the book, Lisa, is painted largely as the whore to Mirabelle’s madonna, which is pretty creepy. It’s like she is a caricature of everything that Steve Martin finds detestable in women, and she is duly punished for it in the end when she is humiliated by mistakenly having sex with Jeremy instead of her intended target. There is no indication whatsoever that Lisa is experiencing anything like that journeys of self-discovery and actualization that Mirabelle, Ray, and Jeremy go through in the book. She’s simply a repository for every hateful stereotype of women that you might find over at The Spearhead or some other men’s rights website: fake, shallow, deceptive, scheming, greedy, materialistic, hyper-sexual.

Martin reiterates several times that what is appealing about Mirabelle is something “simple” within her, even as he lingers time and again on details of her clothing, her hair, and her appearance. About Lisa, he points out that she will attract obsessive and abusive men—presented as a natural consequence of Lisa’s performance of the woman role.

The problem is that Ray, presented in the book as a hapless man-child trying to figure out women, obsesses over and is abusive to Mirabelle, so I’m just not sure what commentary the book was trying to make. It’s like Martin set up this sort of virgin-whore dichotomy with Mirabelle and Lisa, but only managed to show that all women can be objects of prey to men, and for essentially the same reasons.

It seems like the only difference is that in the Shopgirl universe Lisa somehow deserves her humiliation and abuse because she is a bad woman. Mirabelle, on the other hand, is simply a victim of well-meaning abusers, and because she’s so good she is able to be an agent of positive change in the lives of man-children everywhere, which inspires them to not abuse her anymore.

Ugh. I used to really like this book. Now I feel kind of grossed-out by it.

January 26, 2012
Maurice Sendak on The Colbert Report is seriously the funniest shit I have ever seen.

It makes me glad that I’ve made such a point of making sure that we have as many of his books around as possible.

He is my delightful.

January 3, 2012
New Year’s Resolution: Writing in 2012

So, one of my New Year’s resolutions is to write something every day. I haven’t done that yet today, and I sort of did a half-assed job yesterday.

The good news is that I’m not horribly disappointed in myself or discouraged yet. The bad news is that I don’t have a plan of how exactly to make this resolution happen.

My thought right now is that I need to have a project. Something I can do every day and that will, preferably, take around an hour of my time (maybe less). I have a few ideas, but I’m not sure exactly what I want to do.

  1. A Song of Ice and Fire
    Pro - There is so much material here, it would probably take me a full year to get through it all.
    Con - I’ve already read the first four books twice each, so I don’t have a fresh perspective on it. Also, I don’t know if I could be brief enough with writing my feelings about it for this to be a daily project. It’s on my list of things to do, but I think I should give myself more flexibility with such an ambitious project.
  2. Xena
    Pro - I haven’t watched this show in years, and I’ve never watched it critically, so it would be sort of new-again for me. I could easily do one episode a day, and if I take notes while I watch it, I could do a recap in an hour. Also, this is a show I could watch while my daughter is awake, so it could be a fun mother-daughter activity when she’s not at her dad’s.
    Con - I don’t think my partner likes the show that much, and I suspect that he would get bored with it if I didn’t.
  3. Chapter-a-day book reviews
    Pro - I have a few books that I plan on reading this year that I know will be lighter fare than ASOIAF. Right now, I’m planning on reading the Hunger Games trilogy and the Lunar Chronicles as they come out (Cinder hits shelves tomorrow). I have a few other things in mind, too, but nothing else really specific.
    Con - This will have to wait a little while, as I don’t have the money right this moment to buy any new books and probably won’t until February. I don’t want to put off a project that long because I know how I am, and I suspect that sort of delay would mean I’d have to wait til next year before I feel this motivated again.
  4. Some kind of art blog
    Pro - This is somewhat applicable to my profession. I work primarily with artists, and it’s reignited my interest in art, so it would be fun to do some sort of artist-of-the-day type blog. I could broaden my horizons and learn some stuff. I’m thinking I could do theme days or something, which would make planning and preparing for writing easier as well (i.e. Renaissance Thursdays, New Artist Sundays, or something).
    Con - This is somewhat applicable to my profession. I wouldn’t want this to in any way feel like an extension of my job, especially as my job is about to become a lot more time-consuming and stressful now that I’m permanent. While I love what I do, I would somewhat prefer that writing be a way for me to relax and wind down from work. 

My question for my followers is just this: What do you think?

Do any of these sound like something you might be interested in reading if I wrote it? Am I right to think that a project would be a good way motivate myself and have a bit of direction in 2012? Is there some other great idea that I’m not thinking of?

December 2, 2011
"

Will the ebook kill off the print book?”

Every time I hear that question, I think about the “paperless office.” Back in the ’80s, the rise of word processors and email convinced a lot of people that paper would vanish. Why print anything when you could simply squirt documents around electronically?

We all know how that turned out. Paper use exploded; indeed, firms that adopted email used 40 percent more paper. That’s because even in a world of screens, paper offers unique ways to organize and share your thoughts, as Abigail Sellen and Richard Harper noted in The Myth of the Paperless Office. There’s also this technology truism to consider: When you make something easier to do, people do more of it. Now that every office worker has access to a computer and a printer, every office worker can design and distribute elaborate multicolor birthday flyers and spiral-bound presentations.

“Print-on-demand” publishing is about to do the same thing to books. It’ll keep them alive—by allowing them to be much weirder.

"

Clive Thompson on the Future of Printed Books | Magazine

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »